AI case study · Editorial quality

Give your website copy a second look.

I developed a reusable review workflow to spot unfinished AI text, internal notes and formatting problems before website content goes public.

Try the review prompt See examples

Try it yourself

Review a page or snippet

Copy the prompt, replace the bracketed instruction with your material and review the suggested corrections.

Editorial quality review prompt

Act as an editorial and visual quality controller for the website material I provide. Audit it in three categories: AI artifacts and placeholders, internal information leaks, and visual soundness and formatting.

Assign each issue to the best-fitting category, quote the exact problem and identify its location. Preserve the intended meaning and valid links and HTML. Do not invent missing facts. If information is missing, identify what must be confirmed and mark the review as Fail.

Respond only with:
- STATUS: Pass or Fail
- ANOMALIES FOUND: exact issues and their categories, or None.
- QUICK CORRECTIONS: corrected text, Markdown or HTML ready for review.

Here is the material: [paste your text, Markdown or HTML].

Three checks, three practical uses

Find unfinished copy

Check a draft landing page for unresolved placeholders or assistant commentary before a colleague reviews it.

Catch internal notes

Review a product page for private drafting instructions or strategy notes that slipped into the customer copy.

Improve readability

Review a long service description for large paragraphs, broken lists or inconsistent headings.

The review returns a pass or fail, the issues found and a corrected draft. Confirm missing facts and inspect the rendered page before publication.

Need another pair of eyes?

Bring the page and the audience you want to reach.

Discuss a website review